The Enemy of Mankind — by Arch Stanton
What is mankind expected to do when
faced with the “Enemy of Mankind”? Is this what it all boils down to in the end: kill or be killed?
Edited slightly, with a comment by Lasha Darkmoon
Lest this account be difficult to accept, one should read Thomas Goodrich’s unforgettable exposé Hellstorm to see what Jews are capable of doing to a hated, conquered race.
What the Jews did to the Germans after World War II was far worse than any of the horrors inflicted on the nations of Europe by Genghiz Khan, or on the Jews themselves by Adolf Hitler — even if we accept the dubious premise that a holocaust of six million Jews in gas chambers actually took place.
Again, if we compare the Holocaust of 6 million Jews in Germany — assuming it was a real Holocaust and not an Elie Wiesel fantasia — “Some events do take place but are not true; others are, although they never occurred” — even if, as I say, the Holocaust of 6 million Jews actually took place in the real world rather than in the heated imagination of Elie Wiesel and his kind, it would still pale into insignificance if we compare it to the Secret Holocaust of 66 million Russian Christians at the hands of the Jewish Bolshevik regime in the Soviet Union between 1917 and 1953.
For further understanding of the Jewish psyche, read the Old Testament. The story at the end of Genesis describing the massacre at Shechem is most enlightening, as is the story of Joseph. And to think of how Jews shed crocodile tears for unfortunate Negroes hung from trees for raping white women!
Next comes the “Anti-Humans,” a story of a Romanian Christian Iron Guard’s life in a Jewish-run communist camp. Orwell himself would have been hard pressed to describe such horrors.
Then there is the Polish movie “Katyn” about the Katyn forest massacre committed by Jewish commissars and then blamed on the Germans. This blatant lie was covered up by the Allies and their Jewish puppet masters for many decades after the event.
Of course there are a multitude of books about the horrors in the Russian gulag death camps designed by two Jews, Matvei Berman and Naftaly Frenkel. See also “The Prop Masters: Perpetrators of the holocaust against Christian Russia transform themselves into survivors of the Holocaust.”
For further insight on Jewish horror fixation, try Netflix. Surf though the endless listings of horror and murder movies. Watch the “Nightmare on Elm Street” series or the “Hell Raiser” series or the “Freddie Kruger” series or the “Chucky” series. In fact spend a few weeks or months and watch as many Jewish horror films as possible before considering how many innocent children have been exposed to the dreck, the incredibly dark, endless fantasies of horror and bloodlust lurking within the Jew mind.
Lasha Darkmoon comments
In my late teens, when I was still an impressionable young girl, I was lured by a mentally unbalanced boyfriend into watching several of these horror movies with him over a six month period. Unaware at the time of the immense damage being done to my psyche by letting these horror porn images embed themselves in my mind, I went into severe depression and began to have regular nightmares. More than once I vomited after seeing such unmitigated evil gloatingly paraded before my eyes.
My boyfriend then began to read books on serial killers and one day asked me if I would like to join him in an act of gratuitous murder, followed by a suicide pact. That’s when when I finally realized my boyfriend had gone off his head completely. I walked out and never saw him again.
I learned a year later that he had hanged himself.
I regard this poor wretch, to whom I was much attached at that time, as a victim of Jewry. All this “horror porn” was produced in the San Fernando valley, California, by Jews. Most of the script writers were degenerate Jews who also wrote the scripts for porn movies. The same movie studios that produced the horror porn also produced thousands of hard porn sex addiction movies every year. In every single case, I was to learn, there was Jewish money behind this evil trade in pornographic mind filth.
If you have any further doubts about the Jewish capacity for inflicting pain and misery on mankind, just take a look at what they have been doing to the Palestinians for the last 66 years. Having stolen an entire land, they have spent every single day since 1948 in a systematic campaign of genocide — shooting children in their faces, breaking their bones, and carting thousands of others off to their secret prisons where they starve and torture them in subterranean dungeons.
Take another look at those pictures of Rachel Corrie, run over by a Jew driving an American made bulldozer and think of how Americans reacted to her murder. “Stupid bitch, she deserved what she got!”
Look at the unspeakable horrors the Jew has wrought upon what is now the truly “dark continent” of Africa.
Yes, the Jews have said it time and again, they have written it in their holy books, shown it in their movies, demonstrated it during and after their wars and revolutions. They have spat in our faces for millennia. It’s either the white goyim race or the Jews — only one will survive.
Like Rachel Corrie, our kith and kin, white Americans are about to get what Rachel got — instead of what she deserved.
When Jews abuse gentiles and say they hate them, that’s cool; it’s freedom of speech. When gentiles abuse Jews and say they hate them, that’s anti-Semitism — the biggest crime you can commit after cannibalism and pedophilia.
Have you ever noticed how frequently people despise those characteristics in others that are most prevalent in themselves?
Have you ever noticed that the people who hate others most are precisely the ones who are the most vocal in accusing others of hatred?
The fact is, Jews really do hate non-Jews.
They have the same passionate hatred for Palestinians that they exhibit for Russians and Germans.
Their vitriolic hatred for other people is quite evident in their Torah. Only people who hate in so violent a manner could accuse others, who are merely pointing out facts, as “haters.” So when a non-jew says six million is an impossible figure to reconcile for the holocaust, they are “haters”. Yet when a Jew says that all gentiles are beasts, and that even the best of them should be killed, that is merely an astute observation on the part of the Jew.
Here is classic Jew hatred:
“There is a time to love and a time to hate; whoever does not hate when he should does not deserve to love when he should, does not deserve to love when he is able. Perhaps, had we learned to hate more during the years of ordeal, fate itself would have taken fright. The Germans did their best to teach us, but we were poor pupils in the discipline of hate.
Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate — healthy, virile hate — for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German. To do otherwise would be a betrayal of the dead.”
— Elie Wiesel, Legends of Our Time, 1968, pp.177-78
Set aside a zone of hate — healthy, virile hate? I don’t know what Jews think about this, but this sounds very hateful to me.
Healthy, effeminate hatred would probably be more in keeping with the Jewish male’s underlying transvestite traits. Nevertheless, I have never — ever — heard a non-Jew make such a hateful statement. I have heard a lot of hateful things in my day, but never have I heard the suggestion to actually set aside a zone of hate. Sounds like an awful thing to do to my soul, but apparently Jews like the Weasel don’t have a soul to worry about.
Such thoughts never occurred to me until I read what Jews like Weasel wrote. Leaves one wondering why they occur to such a loving person as the Weasel, but then Jews have a lot of thoughts I might never imagine in my wildest nightmares.
Do you note how, like the liar, thief and egotist, the Weasel thoughtfully exonerates himself from originating the hatred he now urges among his fellow tribesmen? If only the Jews could have learned to hate properly, the war would have gone better for them. So the Weasel reasons. Maybe if he’d read his Talmud more often, the Weasel would know just what excellent students Jews are in the “discipline of hate”.
There it is again! Funny thing, I never for a moment thought of hatred as a “discipline”. Maybe it is. Maybe it’s one of the things Jews must master before they can get an advanced degree in Judaism.
Then there is the unbelievable hatred of Ilya Ehrenberg. This Jew must have received a PhD in the “discipline of hatred.”
In one leaflet entitled “Kill,” Ehrenberg incited the simple Russian soldier to treat the Germans as subhuman. The final paragraph concludes:
“The Germans are not human beings. From now on, the word ‘German’ is the most horrible curse. From now on, the word ‘German’ strikes us to the quick. We have nothing to discuss. We will not get excited. We will kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day….
If you cannot kill a German with a bullet, then kill him with your bayonet. If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime….
If you have already killed a German, then kill another one — there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses.
Don’t count the days, don’t count the kilometers. Count only one thing: the number of Germans you have killed.
KILL THE GERMANS! …. KILL THE GERMANS!!! …. KILL!!!
This is typical of the steady diet of pathological hate fed to millions of Soviet troops by this psychopathic Jew, safely ensconced far from the front.
“Kill! Kill! In the German race there is nothing but evil; not one among the living, not one among the yet unborn but is evil! Follow the precepts of Comrade Stalin. Stamp out the fascist beast once and for all in its lair! Use force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill! As you storm onward, kill, you gallant soldiers of the Red Army.”
“Use force and break the racial pride of these German women.Take them as your lawful booty. KILL!” — Ilya Ehrenberg, Russian Jew, advocating the mass rape of German women
Consider this sad and undeniable fact carefully: the basic principle of existence is that killing and death are an integral part of life. Every breath taken results in the death of some living organism, as does every bite taken. One cannot survive without killing other living organisms. That’s the rule, whether one is eating a carrot or defending oneself from a hostile enemy. The object in this life is to reduce one’s participation in this panoply of death as much as possible.
Pause awhile, reader, to consider my simple philosophy, which is no more than the wisdom of the ancients. Reject it if you will, but consider it first. It is where we are now.
We are here to suffer and overcome that suffering; that is the purpose of our existence on this earth. Everything in the universe is cyclical and what is happening at this moment is yet another cycle among the greater cycles. This will never end, it will simply cycle once again.
There is a great conundrum in this existence. We have but two choices in this life. We may serve ourselves or we may serve others. A choice must, and will, be made in this regard. Once the choice is made, once the path is taken, every action will thenceforth be toward that end. Good or bad, all efforts will be directed toward either serving others or serving one’s own materialistic ends. Serving others is the path towards spiritual growth and eventual reunification with the source. Serving one’s self, on the other hand, is the path to the continual recycling of the soul back to this type of miserable existence. It is to be caught up in the Wheel of Birth, back and forth endlessly — until one learns one’s lesson.
The conundrum? Consider this moral dilemma: would saving others by eliminating a deadly enemy help or hinder the soul’s progress? Do you need to kill in order to produce a greater good? Are you entitled to kill someone out of kindness, for his own good?
The answer lies in your motivation. Is this being done to benefit yourself, to further your own material progress? Or is it being done to help others to survive and live a better life? The Sufis provide some insight into this matter. Consider this little Sufi parable:
There was once a Sufi soldier fighting on the field of battle. At one point in the battle, the Sufi became locked in mortal combat with an enemy soldier. With a mighty blow, the Sufi disarmed his enemy and stood poised for the kill.
At that moment his enemy called out, “If I had but one last wish, it is that I had your sword in my hand at this moment.”
Instantly the Sufi stopped the attack and presented his sword to his enemy. Taking the sword in hand, the soldier was dumfounded by this turn of events.
He asked the Sufi, “Why would you do this? You had me for the kill, you were victorious, why would you stop at the moment of victory to give me your sword? Now I have the upper hand and stand ready to kill you.”
The Sufi replied, “It is the custom of my house to grant every request made.”
The enemy soldier returned the sword to the Sufi and became his disciple.
I advise that you spend some time contemplating this story. Such parables of wisdom can be quite sublime in their effects.
But here lies the final conundrum, and I leave it with you, dear reader. What is mankind to do when faced with the “Enemy of Mankind” — with a race clearly hell bent on destroying us and all our cherished values, with a race which has moreover made their undying hatred abundantly clear in the Talmud and their other rabbinical pronouncements — for example, “The best of the gentiles deserves to be killed” — what are we supposed to do in these circumstances? Lay our heads on the chopping block? Kill or be killed?
And what if were to take the noble path of the Sufi in the story above? What if we were to hand our implacable enemy, the Enemy of Mankind, the sword in our hand and say: “Here, take my sword — and kill me if you wish!”
What then? Would it be victory or defeat for us? Would the world be better off if we were dead?